Language Laboratories and English Communication in Odisha’s Higher Education: A Comparative Study

Authors

  • Rakesh kumar Dash Ravenshaw University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62612/ijelass.v3i1.53

Keywords:

Language lab , Communication skill , English Language Learning , Higher Education , Odisha

Abstract

Although the overall status of English language learning in Odisha is relatively stable, students’ achievement in communication skills varies considerably across educational institutions. This variation is largely attributed to the presence and effective use of language laboratories in the teaching and learning process. Institutions that incorporate language labs into their instructional practices tend to report better student outcomes in communication proficiency, whereas those that do not utilize such facilities show limited progress. This study aims to examine the impact of language labs on university students' English communication skills in Odisha. The research employs a survey method using a structured questionnaire, with data collected from both a private and a public university.The findings reveal that language laboratories play a significant role in enhancing students’ communicative competence when effectively managed. Private universities demonstrate stronger results due to modern equipment, skilled instructors, and regular use of the facilities. In contrast, government universities face limitations such as outdated infrastructure, insufficiently trained staff, and a lack of consistent practice sessions. These disparities suggest the need for improved implementation and investment in language lab facilities within public institutions to ensure more equitable language education across the higher education sector in Odisha.

References

Barson, J. & Debski, R. (1996), Calling back CALL. Honolulu: University of Hawaii.

Beatty, K. (2003). Applied linguistics in action: CALL. London: Pearson.

Beder, M. (2008). Language laboratory for learning spoken and written language. Retrieve from: http:/bederebhashe.blogspot.com

Brenes, C. (2006). The language laboratory and EFL course, Costa Rica. Retrieved from revista.inie.ucr.ac.cr/uploads/tx.../language. pdf.

Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge, mass: Harvard University Press.

Dina, Y. (2001). Law of wills in Nigeria edited by A.A. Utuama, New York University, Ontario, Canada. www.nyulawglobal.org/globalex/Nig eria1.htm

Dwyer, T.P. (2010). Designing a language laboratory for communicative language learning. teaching and learning p.5-9. Singapore: Institute of Education.

Educause, S. (2010) Horizon Report. Retrieved January 15, 2012 from Http://www.education world.com/a_tech.

Frayer, D. (2005). Creating a new world of learning possibilities through instructional technology. AAHETLTR Information Technology Conference. Colleges of Worcester Consortium.

Garret, N. (2003). Technology in the service of language learning: trends and Issues. Modern Language Journal, 75 (1), 23-32.

Hamilton-Ekeke, J.T. (2013). Conceptual framework of teachers’ competence in relation to students’ academic achievement. International Journal of Networks and Systems, 2(3) 15-20.

Harmer, J. (2001). The practice of English language. Pearson Education.

Hmoud, S. (2014). The effectiveness of using English Lab on English Language students` pronunciation. Journal of Scientific Research1: 84–94.

Molka-Danielsen, J. & Deutschmann, M. (2009). Learning and teaching in the virtual world of Second Life. Trondheim: Tapir Academic Press.

Morsel, J. (2002). Aural comprehension instruction: Principles and practices. In Mcelce-Murica (ed), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (3rd ed).

Nunan, D. (2007). Approaches to teaching listening in the language classroom. Paper presented at the Korea TESOL conference, Seoul.

Nuboko, O. (2004). Listening comprehension research: A brief review of the past thirty years. Retrieved from: http:// www.talk-waseda.net.

Oribabor, O.A. (2014). Factors Affecting the Poor Performance of Students in English Language. Journal of Literature, Languages and Linguistics - An Open Access

International Journal (4), 65-69.

Randall, D. (2006). The impact of technology on language teaching USA: English language institute, University of Utah. Retrieved from the internet TESL Journal, xii (II) November 2006. http://www.iteslj.org/

Roby, W.B. (2004). Technology in the service of foreign language teaching: The case of the language laboratory. In D. Jonassen (ed.), Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, 523-541, 2nd ed.

Sa’ad, T.U. & Usman, R. (2014). The Causes of Poor Performance in English Language among Senior Secondary School Students in Dutse Metropolis of Jigawa State, Nigeria. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME) 4(5), PP.41-47.

Singh, S. (2013). Language laboratory: Purposes and shortcomings. Journal of technology for ELT3(4), 55-64.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-28