Axiology of Modern Science: Navigating Ethical Dilemmas, Technological Imperatives, and Humanistic Benefits
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62612/ijelass.v2i2.49Keywords:
Axiology of Science, Ethical Responsibility, Technological Ethics, Humanistic Values, Philosophy of ScienceAbstract
In an era characterized by rapid technological innovation, artificial intelligence expansion, and ecological crises, the development of science often prioritizes technical progress over moral considerations. This study critically examines the axiology of science as an essential philosophical framework to ensure scientific advancements remain aligned with human dignity and planetary sustainability. Utilizing a qualitative library research design with a philosophical-hermeneutic approach, this paper synthesizes contemporary and classical literature on the value dimensions of science. The analysis addresses three core issues: the structural alignment between axiology and scientific inquiry, the systemic factors leading to the marginalization of axiological reflection, and a critical evaluation of science's benefits alongside its potential risks. The findings demonstrate that axiology serves not merely as a moral supervisor, but as a active compass that bridges theoretical knowledge with human welfare, limits destructive applications, and promotes inclusive, data-driven public policy. However, the institutional dominance of positivism, hyper-specialization, and commercial pressures frequently sideline axiological considerations in modern research environments. The study concludes that embedding axiological evaluation into scientific education, policy design, and research governance is imperative for transforming scientific progress into sustainable, ethically grounded benefits for humanity.
References
Agriyanto, R., & Rohman, A. (2015). Rekonstruksi Filsafat Ilmu Dalam Perspektif Perekonomian Yang Berkeadilan (Kajian terhadap Ontologi, Epistemologi dan Aksiologi Ilmu Ekonomi yang Islami). At-Taqaddum, 35–53.
Auni, A. K. E. (2021). Telaah Kritis Aksiologi Sains Modern Perspektif Naquib Al-Attas Dan Implementasinya Dalam Komunitas Ilmiah. Prosiding Konferensi Integrasi Interkoneksi Islam Dan Sains, 3, 64–70.
Az-Zahra, F., & Silbi, S. J. (2024). Integrasi Agama Dan Sains Dalam Kehidupan Modern. Jurnal Kajian Islam Dan Sosial Keagamaan, 2(1), 68–74.
Bennett, N. J., Roth, R., Klain, S. C., Chan, K., Christie, P., Clark, D. A., Cullman, G., Curran, D., Durbin, T. J., & Epstein, G. (2017). Conservation social science: Understanding and integrating human dimensions to improve conservation. Biological Conservation, 205, 93–108.
Bennett, N. J., Roth, R., Klain, S. C., Chan, K. M. A., Clark, D. A., Cullman, G., Epstein, G., Nelson, M. P., Stedman, R., & Teel, T. L. (2017). Mainstreaming the social sciences in conservation. Conservation Biology, 31(1), 56–66.
Biedenbach, T., & Jacobsson, M. (2016). The open secret of values: The roles of values and axiology in project research. Project Management Journal, 47(3), 139–155.
Biesta, G. (2015). On the two cultures of educational research, and how we might move ahead: Reconsidering the ontology, axiology and praxeology of education. European Educational Research Journal, 14(1), 11–22.
Chambers, D. A., Feero, W. G., & Khoury, M. J. (2016). Convergence of implementation science, precision medicine, and the learning health care system: A new model for biomedical research. Jama, 315(18), 1941–1942.
Harahap, A. N. (2022). AKSIOLOGI ILMU DALAM PERSPEKTIF ISLAM DAN BARAT. Journal Of Social Research, 1(3), 748–753.
Ives, C. D., Abson, D. J., Von Wehrden, H., Dorninger, C., Klaniecki, K., & Fischer, J. (2018). Reconnecting with nature for sustainability. Sustainability Science, 13, 1389–1397.
Ives, C. D., Giusti, M., Fischer, J., Abson, D. J., Klaniecki, K., Dorninger, C., Laudan, J., Barthel, S., Abernethy, P., & Martín-López, B. (2017). Human–nature connection: A multidisciplinary review. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 26, 106–113.
Mayasari, A., Natsir, N. F., & Haryanti, E. (2022). Aksiologi Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Keislaman. JIIP-Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 5(1), 218–225.
Menapace, M. (2019). Scientific ethics: A new approach. Science and Engineering Ethics, 25(4), 1193–1216.
Mukti, A. (2022). Etika dan Moral dalam Dunia Ilmiah dan Kemanusiaan. JURNAL AS-SAID, 2(1), 80–99.
Natasya, A. S., Rohman, N., & Andhika, M. R. (2026). THE INFLUENCE OF THE PICTURE AND PICTURE MODEL ON THE LEARNING OUTCOMES OF SBDP MADRASAH IBTIDAIYAH STUDENTS. JURNAL TARBIYAH, 33(1), 60–75. https://doi.org/10.30829/tar.v33i1.5506
Qorib, M., & Afandi, A. (2024). Implementing prophetic values in the islamic life guidelines for Muhammadiyah citizens: A qualitative analysis for transforming science and technology. MIQOT: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman, 48(1), 1–25.
Rokhmah, D. (2021). Ilmu dalam tinjauan filsafat: Ontologi, epistemologi, dan aksiologi. CENDEKIA: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, 7(2), 172–186.
Tojimatovich, A. A., & Saydaliyevich, U. S. (2021). Formation Of Science as A Value and Classification of Values. Texas Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 3, 172–178.
Varpio, L., & MacLeod, A. (2020). Philosophy of science series: Harnessing the multidisciplinary edge effect by exploring paradigms, ontologies, epistemologies, axiologies, and methodologies. Academic Medicine, 95(5), 686–689.
Zaidi, Z., & Larsen, D. (2018). Commentary: Paradigms, axiology, and praxeology in medical education research. Academic Medicine, 93(11S), S1–S7.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ade Sofa, Ahmad Syukri SS, Badarussyamsi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.







